The Infinite Manager (Part 3): An exercise to make you rethink how you manage projects
Published: November 2019
The following excerpt is from our in-house onboarding flow for new team members. We are publishing it as a series of articles, which we’re calling The Infinite Manager. The series describes the unconventional operating system that has enabled our small team to have such an impact on the web’s leading companies.
In part 1, we explained why Meetings Managers (people who manage using meetings) are much less efficient than Flow Managers (people who manage using flows). In part 2, we showed how we manage our own work using flows.
In this part, we describe the philosophy of management that inspired how we do things. The examples are about our company, but the principles can be transferred to any company.
How would you prefer to be managed, by Theory X or Theory Y?
MIT professor Douglas McGregor described two theories of motivation and management: Theory X and Theory Y.
Theory X takes a pessimistic view of people. It assumes that they don’t like their work—so they have little motivation, and want to do as little work as possible. Theory X managers therefore have an authoritarian style. They manage via control and incentives. They believe that all employees’ activities should be measurable and traceable, so that management can use “carrot and stick” to reward and reprimand them. Theory X is believed to work when workers are intrinsically unmotivated by the work they do—because they don’t enjoy it, and they don’t believe in its importance.
Theory Y is the opposite of Theory X. It has an optimistic view of people, believing that they are keen to work, and want to do a good job. A Theory Y manager is trusting and collaborative—acting more like a supportive service function than a bossy boss.
Our company runs according to Theory Y.
Theory Y depends upon…
A company can be run according to Theory Y only if its team members are internally motivated. Such motivation requires that the company gives its team members what the author Daniel Pink describes as “the three noble motivators”: mastery, autonomy, and purpose:
Motivator 1: Purpose
Salary isn’t everything; people desire to do something that has meaning and is important. Elon Musk is a master of this: his company SpaceX aims to populate Mars, and his other company Tesla aims to transition the world to electric cars. Within any industry, though, there are opportunities to excel and create greatness.
More generally, CEO Jack Welch talks about how people are motivated by winning, and seek out opportunities to win in their personal and work lives. By having a goal, a company gives its team members a chance to win.
Our purpose is defined by our mission and our values. Both are designed to attract kindred spirits—people who share our passion. We are lucky that many people are passionate about conversion rate optimization. The role of CRE’s managers is to keep the mission and values alive.
Motivator 2: Mastery
Working toward self-improvement and mastery of a craft tends to be a better motivator than competing against others. Constant improvement and visible progress are great motivators. Apple’s hiring page says, “Join us and you’ll do the best work of your life”—which is an excellent example of appealing to people’s desire for mastery. We also like how Steve Jobs got his team to sign the inside of the case for the first Macintoshes—because “artists sign their work.”
In our case, we expose our team members to the world’s most sophisticated clients, on cutting-edge projects, and with peers who are motivated to master their craft. Also, we are also constantly on the look-out for people who have what we call “the excellence gene”—people who have mastered many activities.
Motivator 3: Autonomy
Once people have a purpose, and a chance of mastery, they desire to self-direct their work, rather than just to comply with authority.
We trust our team members to work remotely, to manage their time as they see fit, and to take initiative to do what’s right. We care about their outcomes, not their inputs.
Hiring motivated people
We hire people who are motivated by our definitions of purpose, mastery, and autonomy. Then, when they join us, we can expect that they will continue to try hard (why would they stop now?) so the job of our managers is to support them.
People are motivated by reciprocity and expectations from their peers more than from their manager. In other words, people are motivated by “not letting the rest of the team down.” That’s another reason to hire the right people; people are motivated by having colleagues they respect and admire.
An exercise to make you rethink how you manage projects
Business consultant Julia Langkraehr teaches the following three-minute exercise.
(You might want to close your eyes in between questions.)
Step 1: Think of the best team you have ever been in—one in which the team members worked well together toward an impressive goal. It could be a sports team, a work team, a hobby group—or any other highly functional team in which you’ve participated:
Step 2: Recall the following:
- Who were the team members?
- What was the goal?
- How was it defined?
- Was there a vision?
- How did team members relate to one another?
- Who was the leader?
- How did it feel to be in the team?
- What motivated the team members?
- How did the team differ from other teams you have been in?
It’s likely your recalled experience is an example of Theory Y management. It’s also likely that it doesn’t reflect the traditional approach to management (SMART goals, GANTT charts, etc.) you have learned elsewhere—to the point that you may not have considered the experience to be “proper management.”
Either way, when you’re managing others, use your recalled experience as your “winning model.”
© 2019 Implementra Limited trading as Conversion Rate Experts. All rights reserved.